Predictably, the slots pay a computer-prescribed return: limited to’luck’of the draw in slot winning or losing cycles. So, bet accordingly! A word to the wise: make the most of the perks, the advice, and find the fairly loose machines; otherwise, you are a certain loser.
We submit to numerous generic outcomes: not merely testing our luck on games of chance but another big gamble: the odds no less insurmountable than Casino gambling. Oddly, no pun intended, the comparison rests in our collection of a beneficial, spiritual, rut, or to even the denial of supernatural existence. Here,’chance’is dependent upon whether we’re born Judaic, Christian, Islamic, or as a doubting Thomas. Yet, like playing the slots, we can evaluate our luck of the draw in this regard also. We only have to discover the paying proposition.
Why compare religious ethos with a questionable ethic like gambling?
If you can accept the diversity in religious customs and their irresponsibility to established rules of engagement, Areadomino you can wonder at the power or outcome in discipline assurances. An interest shrouded in mysterious symbols, numbers, parables, or other unspecific language is not an easy topic to decipher, nevertheless the dilemma isn’t impossible to solve.
The slots are easy to work: first, we all know they are computers programmed to come back a specific profit to the Casino; second, we all know they have to have winning and losing cycles to encourage bettors and yet assure profit for the house; third, we all know some machines are set to cover a smaller return than others; fourth, every slot winning cycle is followed by a losing cycle. Learn to identify the symptoms. Some players more often than not leave the Casino a winner. Allow yourself to quit a winner.
Back once again to the other chance so commonly abused:
First, any spiritual belief is strictly in the mind;
Second, Daniel clearly limits the monotheism experience to Ten Ages; if one does not know the chronological schedule, he then is subject to much disillusionment and false belief;
Third, Ezekiel advises of a strict limit to benefit, to the likes of Noah, Daniel, and Job;
Fourth, involving the statements of Jesus and Paul, a strict limit to time-frame was “at hand” in the Last Age, and was coming to an in depth in A.D. 68.
Therefore, in view of those factual observations, thinkers must commit to a reevaluation of the monotheism incentive.
If, in view of those conclusions, one still really wants to gamble, have a ride on the slots, or chance a religion choice, upon what group of rules or inescapable facts will he select as a plus in these greatly contested gambles? You cannot lose by investigating the syllogistic expressions now available and resulting from fifteen years of arduous research.